Tasty Christians

http://www.stsimonoftrent.com/

Why has this rancorous canard proven so persistent? Haaretz published an interesting article on St. Simon of Trent, but my own comment on this is simply that those who believe it do so against all logic.  To be sure, if I were to become a cannibal blood in the matzah would be the last route I took.  When there is such bedlam over using tap water during Pesach for fear that chametz has entered into the system, over milk from cows who ate grains, how can I possibly use the blood of a child who surely ate his wheaties or, at the very least, his eucharist wafer.  The eucharist wafer, not to put to fine a talmudic point on it, might not actually be considered chametz if one is mekabel the shitta of transubstantiation.  However, if transubstantiation can only occur when a wafer of chametz is combined in the digestive tract of a christian with wine (most assuredly yayin nesech, which presents another difficulty) and then I get hanaah from using the Christian youth's blood in my own matzah... hmm.  Would it not be simpler to make a nice Shobbos cholent instead?

Complete Rubbi"Sh!

An extraordinarily intelligent man occasionally gives private shiurim which I, even more occasionally, attend. From time to time I come across "underground" recordings of his as well. When I credit him in my writings, I attach the nom de guerre (and those who do not understand that this is a war are simply naive) Rubbi"Sh which is an acronym for Rebbe Shloime (the "e" on the end of his name is pronounced in the yiddishe fashion). As he tells it, he is one of the most quoted individuals in the history of the world. In every instance that somebody declaims, "That's Rubbi"Sh!" the intended information is being attributed to our teacher. His prolificacy is surpassed only by a certain Sufi mystic name Ibid.

Politics is SOOO Gay!

An acquaintance of my brother's, a member of the Kiryat Moshe Crowd to whom I shall refer as The Disgruntled Zionist, made an interesting statement. Here I quote verbatim from The Disgruntled Zionist, with a single caveat detailed post dictum: "If Hashem considers two male consenting adults doing each other up the pooper a toeva (abomination), what does he think of a government who anally rapes an entire community (read: Gush Katif)?" The single possible error in my rendering of this quote is whether DZ used the word "pooper" or "poop-chute". I do hope he will be forgiving of my imprecision.

"The Only Reason For Time Is So That Everything Doesn't Happen At Once." -Albert Einstein

I owe apologies all around due to my hiatus after only just beginning this blog. The majority of my redress shall be (by Divine Mechanism) delivered directly to one Dov Berger. This ursine gentleman, who I tell you has also been derelict in electronic publication, I have barely (pun intended) seen throughout the last year. Much of this time I have traversed in examining my dear brother, who continues to associate with the "Kiryat Moshe crowd" as I call them. This brother of mine leans toward the "mamlachti" type of zionism which I rather detest and supports the absurdity known as The Sanhedrin. Perhaps I am amiss in my assumptions, but it does seem to me that most of those involved in the Sanhedrin Project are what the media refers to as "kahanist sympathizers." These are individuals who seem to intentionally marginalize themselves. Aside from their "social standing" I feel that perhaps I have kindred spirit in in my knee jerk distaste for those who claim affiliation with HaRav Meir David Ben Yechezkel Kahane HY"D. What is next on their agenda? Tracing the lineage of David and appointing a king? That would be a truly horrible idea judging by our track record with kings in the past.

The Orthodoxy Test

My brother showed me this test, and I took it. It did not know how to qualify me. That is truly telling. This was its response:
This means you're: Huh?
I believe that is the sum total of my religious existence... neither here nor there... best described as: Huh?
Try it out for yourself through my Links section.

Frank Yehudi

I do not subscribe to any of the varied philosophies coagulated together under the banner of "Zionism" (although my own ignorant and obfuscatory brand of ethnocentrism could possibly be rolled into that same lump, if one did not examine me too closely) and I have very little patience for their brand of self-destructive hypocrisy.

However, there is this blog, The Ideological Underground, I stumbled across while skipping through the catty sandbox of Arutz Sheva's editorials. He calls himself Frank Yehudi, which is clearly a code of sorts (frank=honest, yehudi=jew) through which he tells his readership that he is an honest Jew. That, together with the subject matter of his posts, seems to be implying that his own Judaic Veracity is a brand sorely lacking among throng and throe of our World-Kehilla. And perhaps, with a slight caveat or two, I believe him to be veridic.

He seems to be a clear result of post-modern Zionism poured into a thinking man who has decided to question an extremely traditional Orthodox upbringing. His brand of irreverent religion is quite appealing to me and he quite often makes very good points. I also think that he is a liar, but then this is the internet and if one were not to prevaricate here, where would one find the appropriate forum? Besides, I am lying as well. But I am honest about it.

While itt is unfortunate that he does not post regularly, I am highly suspicious of the veracity of any comments concerning a book, website, or radio spots. (Although, I do not see why he could not have some sort of column or even a show on Arutz Sheva. I truly believe it would improve their ratings, as many of their shows are unmitigated drek.) I suspect he has better things to do with his time than write regularly. I would guess either a student or a family man.

As I stated previously, I am not a Zionist. And I do not throw my lot in with those who can not make up their minds as to what is true observance. My brother is among those. He lives in Jerusalem, specifically the Kiryat Moshe neighborhood. I visit him occasionally and have met his Rebbe. I do not like or approve of this charlatan. The philosophical smoke and mirrors thrown up by this man have captivated the admiration of my dear brother and a few others. I shall write on that more later.

"Jewish"

First I want to make the statement that I dislike the term Jewish. Aside from the sound of the word itself, and the historic and ethnically disparaging connotations that come with it (eg. both Muslims and Christians named themselves while we are satified with the mispronounced misnomer of "Jew" which was given to us by those who oppressed us.) what truly sparks my loathing is the -ish. This -ish is a signifier of an approximation. "Will you be home around five-ish, dear?" "It was a sort of greenish colour." So, I am an approximation of a Jew. While, from a certain historical perspective that may have a ring of truth to it, my ethno-centric leanings refuse to accept it as the defacto appelation by which we know ourselves. Were it up to me what would I choose? As of now, I have no answer to that, but I am taking suggestions.